Feds dock LANL $2.6M for big lapses in 2017 | Local News

Plutonium shipping errors in June and a potentially deadly worker safety lapse in September cost the operators of Los Alamos National Laboratory at least $2.6 million in performance award fees, according to an annual federal lab review released Friday.

Still, the lab earned about $47 million in bonuses for fiscal year 2017, 70 percent of its possible performance award from the National Nuclear Security Administration.

The award rate was 15 percent lower than the laboratory earned the previous fiscal year and the most significant deduction since 2014, when a transuranic waste drum from the lab ruptured inside the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant in Carlsbad, releasing radiation and causing a three-year shutdown of the storage site. That costly mishap contributed to a more than $18 million loss in award fees for Los Alamos National Security LLC, a private consortium that runs the lab.

Several safety lapses and worker injuries were reported at the lab last year, including a small fire that burned one worker, two radiation releases and the discovery of an excess amount of plutonium in one location, a violation of a safety program meant to prevent a runaway nuclear reaction. A damning report from an independent federal safety board in the fall also said the lab was not prepared to respond to an emergency.

But the performance report released Friday cited just two issues in 2017 that prompted award fee deductions.

In June, a worker shipped plutonium by aircraft to South Carolina and California in containers that are certified only for truck shipment. In a letter accompanying the report, a National Nuclear Security Administration official said the agency was concerned that lab managers viewed the misshipments as “isolated events.”

The agency also cited a Sept. 13 incident in which a worker entered a room with a low level of oxygen, classified as a “near-miss to a fatality.”

In the letter accompanying the report, dated Nov. 30, an agency contract officer called the events significant lapses that indicate a “programmatic breakdown” in the lab’s safety management.

According to the letter, the lab would see a $3.1 million deduction in performance awards. However, a report summary indicates $2.6 million in losses. A spokesman for the National Nuclear Security Administration said he could not provide a reason for the discrepancy Friday evening.

Lab Director Terry Wallace responded to the performance report in an statement issued Friday that lauded workers’ efforts.

“Serving the nation is a commitment all of us at the Laboratory take very seriously — and one we’re called upon to do every day,” he said in the statement.

The performance assessment comes as the lab prepares for a major shift in management. Since 2006, the lab has been managed by LANS, a private limited liability company formed by the University of California, Bechtel, BWXT Government Group Inc., and URS, an AECOM company.

In part because of the WIPP incident, the federal government announced that it would not renew the group’s multibillion-dollar contract after 2017. Following a one-year management extension, the lab is expected to be under new management by September.

The fiscal year 2017 report had other anomalies that National Nuclear Security Administration officials could not explain Friday night.

The lab operators’ annual award fees include both fixed fees and higher-risk, performance-based incentives.

Award fees overall were reduced for 2017 by about $15 million, to just over $50 million. Good-performance incentives for 2017 were cut to a fifth of the possible award a year earlier, to $8.5 million from $41.3 million, while the fixed fees — which aren’t vulnerable to cuts due to poor management practices — surged to $41 million from $23.8 million in 2016.

Share On Facebook
Share On Twitter
Share On Google Plus
Share On Linkedin
Share On Pinterest
Share On Reddit
Share On Stumbleupon
Loading Facebook Comments ...
0 replies

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *